Pediatric Trauma Scoring System in Predicting Mortality

paediatric suffering leveling System in Predicting MortalityPEDIATRIC TRAUMA SCORE AS PREDICTOR OF OUTCOME OF PATIENTS ADMITTED TO CENTRALIZED SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE social unit IN A GOVERNMENT TERTIARY HOSPITAL A backward COHORT STUDYI. Justification of the Study intense distress do by of paediatric perseverings is faced with many issues such as lumber of assistance, aptitude and cost-effectiveness. make headway systems such as the paediatric Trauma differentiate stomach economic aid in clinical decision making through quarry measurement of inclementness of illness in relation to a grouchy essence such as fatality arrange or morbidity. In particular(a), gain ground systems have become the standard for intensifier care unit subject and efficiency benchmarking. Furthermore, there is considerable difference between clinicians prognostication estimates. untimely identification of patients with tall luck of mortality invest can help families with delicate decisions, prevent uncalled-for suffering and help adopt limited resources to a more practical(a) social function. Thus, this mull will investigate the use of a simple paediatric Trauma gain system in predicting mortality.II. Relationships of investigate aims, selective information substrates, ope proportionalitynally-defined variables and data analyses.ObjectiveData SubstratesOperationally-defined variablesAnalysesTo compare the outcome of patients to paediatric damage fit paediatric damage impinge on sheet pediatric Trauma shootMortality rate per category of Pediatric Trauma ScoreRate of patients with Prolonged Hospital Stay per category of Pediatric Trauma ScoreRelationship of outcome of patient (mortality and distanceen infirmary stay) to pediatric distress scoreTOPIC BACKGROUNDIntensive trauma care of pediatric patients is faced with many issues such as quality of care, efficiency and cost-effectiveness.1 Quantitative observations of harshness of illness in pediatric trauma development mark systems has the potential to impact overall evaluation from service line presentation to case endpoints.2 Scoring systems have become the standard for intensifier care unit outcome and efficiency benchmarking.1 Early identification of patients with high probability of mortality can help families with difficult decisions, prevent unnecessary suffering and help direct limited resources to a more practical use.1A Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) was developed with grading variables normally seen in pediatric trauma accounting for the unique physiological and anatomical reference nature. The PTS consists of six variables. Each variable is scored +2 for minimal or no injury, +1 for minor or potentially major(ip) injury, or -1 for major or life-threatening injury. The total score ranges from +12 to -6 with increasing severity.3 Scoring systems such as the Pediatric Trauma Score can aid in clinical decision making through objective measurement of severity of illness in relation to a particular outcome such as mortality or morbidity.4 Several studies revealed consistently the direct linear relationship between Pediatric Trauma Score and injury severity thereby confirming that P.T.S. is an effective predictor of both severity of injury and potential for mortality.5REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATUREMost of the hit systems are non appropriate for pediatric trauma patients. Variables such as respiratory rate, heart rate, and systolic line of business pressure differ with early childhood and childhood. In addition, the verbal response as used in GCS is non applicable for young children. For these reasons, Tepas and colleagues3 created the Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS). The authors stated that pack becomes a variable be take in pediatric patients had fewer physiologic reserve. Systolic blood pressure, patency of airway, level of consciousness, presence of wounds or fractures were variables included. 3 The presence of these injuries suggests strong energy transfer and positively correlates with concomitant visceral injury.10Below is the Pediatric Trauma Score.Pediatric Trauma Score+2+1-1 metric weight unit20kg10-20 kgAirwayPatentMaintanableUnmaintainableSystolic B/P90 mmHg50-90 mmHgsystema nervosum centraleAwake+ LOCUnresponsiveFracturesNoneClosed or suspectedMultiple, closed(a) or openWoundsNoneMinorMajor, penetrating or burnThe assessment of severity of illness as well as mortality predictive value of the Pediatric Trauma Score (P.T.S.) was evaluated in some(prenominal) studies with different conclusions.In a demand by Tepas, three categories of patients with probability of mortality were determine. Pediatric trauma score of greater than 8 had a 0% mortality while pediatric trauma score between 0 and 8 had an increasing mortality related to their decreasing pediatric trauma score. Score of slight than 0 had 100% mortality. This paper attested the direct linear relationship between Pediatric Trauma Score and in jury severity validating that P.T.S. is an effective predictor of both severity of injury and assay for mortality.5 Consistent with the findings of the latter, Ramenonofsky compared the evaluation of pediatric trauma patients by paramedic in the field versus the physician in the emergency fashion using the Pediatric Trauma Score. There was agreement between the lashings of these two individuals 93.6% of the time, correlation coefficient 0.991, r2 = 0.982. The sensitivity and specificity of Pediatric Trauma Score was computed at 95.8% and 98.6%, respectively. He described Pediatric Trauma Scoring System as a straightforward modality for assessing the severity of injury.6 Eichelberge examined the applicability of the PTS found hearty correlations with survival, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and mortality. 8 On the other hand, the use of PTS as a predictor of mortality was found to be unequal to(predicate) in a backward study by Balik. Size compartmentalization was noted to be ove remphasized because of the low mortality (7.7%) in children slight(prenominal)(prenominal) than 10 kg. Forty-nine of 71 surgically treated patients with intra-abdominal organ injuries had a PTS 8. The alive variables of PTS did not have equal relationships to mortality.7Critics have also noted that the PTS suffers from scoring ambiguity leading to misinterpretation and inadequate scoring.11 Problem also arises out-of-pocket to a systematic bias in scoring. For example, the assessment of a patients consciousness can be do at the blastoff or on admission to the emergency department. 12 Despite arrant(a) review of the literature on Pediatric Trauma Scoring, there has been no mention of the predictive value of Pediatric Trauma Scoring make on patients upon entry to an ICU. Conclusion of studies on Pediatric Trauma Score may be less generalizable cod to possible variability in settings.9RESEARCH QUESTIONAmong pediatric trauma patients admitted to Centralized running(a) Intensiv e Care Unit in Davao regional Hospital, what is the relationship of outcome of patients to pediatric trauma score using a retrospective cohort study?SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDYInvestigating the reliability of Pediatric Trauma Scoring system in predicting mortality and prolonged hospital stay is important. The results of this study can be a validation of earlier studies made on this scoring system as a tool in objective measurement of severity of illness as well as an intensive care unit outcome and efficiency benchmarking.OBJECTIVESTo get word the pediatric trauma score of all patients and classify as to pediatric trauma score category of greater than 8, 0 to 8 and less than 0To determine the mortality rate per pediatric trauma score category of greater than 8, 0 to 8 and less than 0To determine the survival rate per pediatric trauma score category of greater than 8, 0 to 8 and less than 0To determine the rate of pediatric trauma patients with prolonged hospital stay per pediatric trauma score category of greater than 8, 0 to 8 and less than 0 among endure patientsTo determine the riskiness for mortality or prolonged hospital stay among pediatric trauma patients per pediatric trauma score category of greater than 8, 0 to 8 and less than 0METHODOLOGYRESEARCH DESIGNA retrospective cohort study of all pediatric trauma patients admitted to Centralizedoperative Intensive Care Unit between January 1, 2013 to declination 31, 2013 in Davao Regional Hospital will be conducted.SETTINGThis study will be conducted in Davao Regional Hospital (DRH), a tertiary hospital with 250-bed capacity, in Tagum City.The Centralized Surgical Intensive Care Unit (CENSICU) is an intensive care unit foradult and pediatric surgical patients in Davao Regional Hospital.The department of Surgery of Davao Regional Hospital is a member of the Mindanao Integrated Surgical Residency Training Program under the Department of Health, Region XI.PARTICIPANTS all(prenominal) pediatric trauma patie nts admitted to CENSICU in Davao Regional Hospital between January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 will be retrospectively included in the study.INCLUSION CRITERIA in all patients admitted to Centralized Surgical Intensive Care Unit due to traumaAll patients vulcanized less than 14 years old riddance CRITERIAPatients discharged against medical advicePatients transferred to another hospitalOPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF scatheTraumaan injury to any site of the body described as manifold or single (neck, thorax, abdomen or extremeties) site caused by an extrinsic, forthright or penetrating agentPediatric trauma patients-patients aged less than 14 years old admitted due to traumaPediatric Non-Trauma patients- patients aged less than 14 years old admitted for surgicalintervention of non-trauma cause (example intestinal obstruction due to Hirschsprungs disease, massive pleural effusion due to malignancy)Prolonged Hospital Stay-length of hospital stay is more than 14 old age with or without s urgical intervention data GATHERINGAll pediatric trauma patients admitted to Centralized Surgical Intensive Care Unit (CENSICU) in Davao Regional Hospital between January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 will be identified from the admission logbook in the CENSICU of Davao Regional Hospital. The patients will be identified using the inclusion and exclusion criteria . The list of patients will be submitted to Medical Records dent of Davao Regional Hospital for chart retrieval. The charts will be reviewed for the following data will be gathered from each patient age in years, sex, length of hospital stay in days, weight in kilograms, systolic blood pressure in mmHg, patency of airway, passage of consciousness, presence of fractures and wounds. after(prenominal) calculating the Pediatric Trauma Score of each patient, the category of Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS greater than 8, PTS between 0 to 8, or PTS less than 0) can be determined. In addition, the outcome of the patient will be deter mined as toMortalityWith prolonged hospital stay among surviving patientsMaIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND OTHER DEPENDENT VARIABLESThe primary outcome is the mortality rate of admitted patients categorized per pediatric trauma score of greater than 8, pediatric trauma score of 0 to 8 and pediatric score of less than 0, respectively.The secondary outcomes are the followingNumber of pediatric trauma patients categorized per pediatric trauma score of greater than 8, pediatric trauma score of 0 to 8 and pediatric score of less than 0, respectively survival of the fittest rate of admitted patients categorized per pediatric trauma score of greater than 8, pediatric trauma score of 0 to 8 and pediatric score of less than 0Rate of surviving pediatric trauma patients with prolonged hospital stay per pediatric trauma score category of greater than 8, 0 to 8 and less than 0INDEPENDENT VARIABLEThe identified self-sufficient variables include age, sex, weight in kilograms, length of hospital stay, pat ency of airway, systolic blood pressure in mmHg, level of consciousness, presence of fractures and minor or major wounds.SAMPLE SIZE COMPUTATIONSample size for this study was computed using Epi Info 7 StatCalc. Calculations were based on the assumptions that 1) the ratio of patients unexposed to the risk factor (i.e., PTS greater than 8) to patients exposed to the risk factor (i.e., PTS 8 or less) is 3 and 2) the prevalence of the outcome (i.e., death) in the unexposed group is 15%. Estimations were done in order for the study to detect an betting odds ratio of 5 as statistically probative. In a computation for odds ratio carried out with 5% level of significance, a sample size of 79 patients will have 80% power of rejecting the null hypothesis (no significant increase or decrease in odds ratio) if the alternative holds.DATA HANDLING AND ANALYSISClinical characteristics (age in years, sex, weight in grams, length of hospital stay), systolic blood pressure in mmHg, patency of airway , loss of consciousness, presence of fractures and wounds, and Pediatric Trauma scores of patients will be compared statistically. A p value will be computed to establish whether the difference in the values were significant or not. A p value The Pediatric Trauma Score of each patient will be calculate and the category of Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS greater than 8, PTS between 0 to 8, or PTS less than 0) to which the patient belongs will be determined. The total act of patients in each category will be evaluated.Outcome (mortality rate or survival rate) of each patient belonging to a particular category will be tallied and each frequency computed. Among surviving patients, length of stay will be evaluated as to prolonged (14 days) or not prolonged. Rate of surviving patients with prolonged hospital stay will be determined.Risk of mortality as well as prolonged hospital stay among surviving patients will be expressed in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval.