The Prince by Machiavelli Essay Example for Free

The Prince by Machiavelli EssayIn Chapter 25 of his masterwork The Prince, Machiavelli attempt to delimitate and define fate and how it could be controlled in both political and personal life. In be ones life and actions against fate, Machiavelli saw the importance of forming a balance of the humilitary personnel tendencies of caution and impulsiveness. Machiavelli favored impulsiveness in want to human actions directed towards fate, but he saw legitimate value in both mindsets. What he saw as most important was a willingness to change in the face of fate, as the world power to adapt is most important when facing change. Machiavelli used the image of a torrential flood to describe fate. To Machiavelli, fate was like the flood in that everything flies before it, whole yield to its violence, without being qualified in any way to withstand it and yet, though its nature be such, it does non follow then that work force, when the weather becomes fair, shall not make provision , both with defences and barriers, in such a manner that, rising again, the water may pass away by canal, and their force be neither so unrestrained nor so dangerous. (Machiavelli, 1505, Chapter 25)This implies that what Machiavelli truly meant by fate is uncontrollable change, outcomes in the world that directly affect those that are not necessarily involved in those changes, social or technological, political or personal. These changes happen without the consent of all and therefore many merely must roll with the punches, although men can make plans that will booster them roll with those punches when the time for change arrives. To be sure, change is coming, although one cannot be sure exactly how or when it will come but can make provisions that will be helpful when it does. after comparing fate to a torrential flood, Machiavelli went on to compare fate to a lady, in nightspot to describe how he would recommend mastering it. Machiavelli used a fairly non-modern view in the in tercession of women to describe fate, saying that the best way to control fate, and women, was to beat and ill-use them. Furthermore, he saw that those gossamer and adventurous in spirit were more likely to control both women and fate and that young men are best equipped to handle both.While Machiavellis comparison between fate and women is easily seen as a bit sexist now, the comparison was certainly far more palatable when he make it. Further, the assertion that the young and bold are best equipped to deal with change is probably chasten the young are less set in their ways and have more energy with which to fire new challenges. While the simile is certainly not politically correct, it certainly introduces a worthwhile observation. It is an ambitious program to attempt to synthesize Machiavellis project in The Prince with the modern project of employing science and technology to outstrip nature, both of the world and human. Machiavellis aim was certainly to investigate ways to overcome human nature. If a man was to act in accordance with human nature, Machiavelli saw, he would for certain be bowled over by the scend of fate.Machiavelli went so far as to make a case study, a very modern concept, of pope Julius II to show that decisive, aggressive action was the best methodology to combat change further, he surely was not afraid to invoke images of technology stemming the natural tide. It seems most likely, however, that while Machiavelli was attempting to make observations that were ahead of his time, he was not absolutely modern in his mindset. Machiavellis chief goal of The Prince was to describe how a political attracter could most effectively use political power.This serves as an incomplete view of modern politics, which in asset to aiming at efficiency in power usage also means to maximize the social get of that usage. Machiavelli centered on the practicality of politics without looking at its utility. He surely spoke of how to employ technolo gy and science to serve human desire, but he did not define desire in a more complex, democratic, modern state, which should not be surprising, because the mindset had yet to arise.ReferencesMachiavelli. (1505). The Prince. Retrieved from http//www.constitution.org/mac/prince00.htm